Validación de un Nuevo Indice de Dificultad para la Exodoncia de Terceros Molares Mandibulares Impactados

El objetivo del presente estudio fue el determinar la validez de un nuevo índice de dificultad para la exodoncia de terceros molares mandibulares impactados. El presente es un estudio descriptivo, comparativo y transversal. Se llevó a cabo en la Clínica Estomatológica de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo-Perú, durante el año 2015. La muestra estuvo conformada por 42 pacientes ASA I, de 18 a 65 años, con indicación de extracción de tercera molar mandibular impactada asintomática, con corona clínica íntegra. Cada paciente firmó un consentimiento informado para así poder participar en el estudio. Antes de la realización de la exodoncia, a cada paciente, se le valoró su grado de dificultad quirúrgica según la clasificación de Winter-Pell y Gregory y el nuevo índice de dificultad propuesto. Para la comparación del grado de dificultad entre los índices con el número de complicaciones, la dificultad quirúrgica entre los índices con la dificultad quirúrgica real y el tiempo quirúrgico entre los índices; se utilizaron la prueba estadística de Chi cuadrado, el Test de Mc Nemar y la T de Student, respectivamente. La significación estadística fue del 5 %. Al comparar los índices con el grado de dificultad real, se obtuvo que existe una alta diferencia estadística significativa (p < 0.001). Al realizar las pruebas de sensibilidad y especificidad de ambos índices, se obtuvo que el nuevo índice y el índice de Winter-Pell y Gregory tuvieron una sensibilidad del 100 % y 55 % y una especificidad del 10 % y 100 %, respectivamente. Se concluye que el nuevo índice propuesto en este estudio pronostica de manera más exacta la dificultad quirúrgica de las exodoncias de terceros molares mandibulares impactados.

The aim of this study was to determine the validity of a new difficulty index for the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. This is a descriptive, comparative and cross-sectional study. It was carried out at the Clinica Estomatológica of the Universidad Nacional de Trujillo - Peru, during the year 2015. The sample consisted of 42 ASA I patients, from 18 to 65 years old, with an indication for extraction of an asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molar, with complete clinical crown. Each patient signed an informed consent in order to participate in the study. Before performing the extraction, each patient was assessed their degree of surgical difficulty according to the Winter-Pell and Gregory classification and the new difficulty index proposed. For the comparison of the degree of difficulty between the indices with the number of complications, the surgical difficulty between the indices with the actual surgical difficulty and the surgical time between the indices; the Chi-square statistical test, the Mc Nemar Test and the Student's T test were used, respectively. Statistical significance was 5 %. When comparing the indices with the actual degree of difficulty, it was found that there is a highly significant statistical difference (p < 0.001). When carrying out the sensitivity and specificity tests of both indices, it was found that the new index and the Winter-Pell and Gregory index had a sensitivity of 100 % and 55 % and a specificity of 10 % and 100 %, respectively. It is concluded that the new index proposed in this study more accurately predicts the surgical difficulty of extractions of impacted mandibular third molars.

Research progress in predicting the difficulty of surgery for middle and low rectal cancer based on pelvic measurement / 中华消化外科杂志

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the basic principle of surgical treat-ment for middle and low rectal cancer. Some of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer require under-going intersphincteric resection (ISR). Due to the limitation of the narrow pelvis, TME and ISR put forward higher requirements for the precise separation of the anatomical level and the protection of neurological function during the operation. At present, evaluation of the difficulty of surgery for middle and low rectal cancer is mainly based on the subjective judgment of chief surgeon, and there is no unified and objective scoring system or prediction model that can classify the difficulty of surgery for middle and low rectal cancer before surgery. The authors review relevant literatures and summarize the existing studies related to pelvic measurement for predicting the difficulty of surgery for middle and low rectal cancer, in order to provide significant guidance for the selection of surgical approach for patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

Establishment of Thoracic Surgical Difficulty Assessment Scale based on Delphi method / 中南大学学报(医学版)

Objective: The difficulty of surgery, which is related to surgical safety, has only been mentioned as a subjective perception for a long time. There are few studies to quantitatively and systematically evaluate the difficulty of thoracic surgery. This study aims to establish a quantitative evaluation index system for thoracic surgical difficulty, and to evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods: During the 2 national thoracic surgery academic conferences, the factors that may affect the difficulty of thoracic surgery were evaluated by the thoracic surgeons via semi open questionnaires, and then the evaluation item pool of thoracic surgery difficulty was established. The importance of each indicator in the evaluation item pool was graded by 2 rounds of Delphi method. The average score, full score rate and coefficient of variation of each index were calculated, and the composite index method was used to decide whether to delete the indicator. Finally, the difficulty evaluation scale of thoracic surgery was constructed. The surgical data of patients with thoracic tumors were collected. The scale was used to evaluate the difficulty of thoracic surgery for lung, esophageal, and mediastinal tumors. The reliability and validity of the scale were evaluated by the commonly used difficulty evaluation indexes: Operation time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), side injury rate, and blood transfusion rate as standards. Results:A total of 230 questionnaires were distributed in the 2 rounds of survey, and 149 valid questionnaires were collected after eliminating duplicate questionnaires. Through 2 rounds of Delphi consultation with 20 experts, the difficulty evaluation indexes were scored and screened, and the difficulty evaluation scale of thoracic surgery was established. It included 5 main indexes (surgical decision-making, operation space, separation interface, reconstruction method, and surgical materials) and 16 secondary indexes [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, surgical trauma, operator experience, space size, space depth, space source, space adjacent, interface content, anatomical gap, visual field, interface size, reconstruction complexity, reconstruction scope, autologous materials, artificial biomaterials and instruments]. After weighting, the total score of Thoracic Surgery Difficulty Evaluation Scale was from 1 to 3. A Score at 1 standed for simplicity, and score at 3 standed for difficulty. Further data were collected for 127 cases of thoracic tumor surgery. The difficulty scores of surgery for lung, esophageal, and mediastinal tumor were 1.69±0.26, 1.86±0.18, and 1.56±0.31, respectively, and the Cronbach ' sαcoefficients of the scale in 3 tumor surgeries were 0.993, 0.974, and 0.989, repectively, and the Spearman Brown coefficients were 0.996, 0.984, and 0.996, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficients of operation difficulty score with operation time, estimated blood loss, and VAS were 0.360 and 0.634, 0.632 and 0.578, 0.696 and 0.875, respectively (all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the difficult operation group (difficulty score >1.85) was higher than that in the non-difficult operation group (P=0.02).Conclusion: The quantitative Thoracic Surgical Difficulty Assessment Scale has been successfully established, which shows good reliability and validity in thoracic tumor surgery. The Thoracic Surgical Difficulty Assessment Scale has broad application prospects in reducing the difficulty of the surgery, controlling surgical complications, and training surgeons.

Evaluation of demographic, radiological and intraoperative factors for assessment of postoperative pain and complications in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a prospective study / Evaluación de factores demográficos, radiológicos e intraoperatorios para la evaluación del dolor postoperatorio y las complicaciones en la extracción quirúrgica del tercer molar mandibular impactado: un estudio prospectivo

Third molars usually erupt within the age of 17 ­ 21years. Usually, due to the evolution of human jaws, the size is decreasing leading to the impacted tooth. An impacted tooth may lead to external resorption of the adjacent tooth, trismus, infection, etc. Many studies have been reported in the literature for evaluating the surgical difficulty and postoperative complications secondary to impacted third molars. This study includes a sample of 100 subjects evaluated for the surgical difficulty and postoperative complications. Various demographic, radiological, and intraoperative factors were evaluated which may lead to postoperative complications. Factors responsible for postoperative sequelae were also evaluated with complications. Postoperative pain after 4 hours and 7 days was assessed to mark the factors commonly responsible. Pain at 7th postoperative day was significant involving factors like fully impacted, horizontal impaction, level C, no/very little retromolar space, and root contact. Postoperative complications were not reported in this study.

Los terceros molares suelen erupcionar entre los 17 y los 21 años de edad. Por lo general, debido a la evolución de las mandíbulas humanas, el tamaño disminuye, lo que conduce al diente impactado. Un diente impactado puede conducir a la reabsorción externa del diente adyacente, trismo, infección, etc. Se han reportado muchos estudios en la literatura para evaluar la dificultad quirúrgica y las complicaciones postoperatorias secundarias a terceros molares impactados. Este estudio incluye una muestra de 100 sujetos evaluados por la dificultad quirúrgica y las complicaciones postoperatorias. Se evaluaron diversos factores demográficos, radiológicos e intraoperatorios que pueden conducir a complicaciones postoperatorias. También se evaluaron los factores responsables de las secuelas postoperatorias con las complicaciones. Se evaluó el dolor postoperatorio después de 4 horas y 7 días para marcar los factores comúnmente responsables. El dolor al séptimo día postoperatorio fue significativo e involucró factores como impacto total, impactación horizontal, nivel C, espacio retromolar nulo o muy pequeño y contacto con la raíz. En este estudio no se informaron complicaciones posoperatorias.

Assessment of intraoperative risk factors for surgical difficulty in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: a prospective study

The extraction of impacted third molars is among the most common surgical procedures carried out in the field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. For proper planning of surgical extraction, espe-cially for impacted mandibular third molars the estimated level of surgical difficulty of the case is important. This study was conducted to evaluate the intraoperative risk factors contributing to surgical difficulty in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars and consequently the post-operative outcome. Here, we have undertaken a study in which the intraoperative variables were considered, to evaluate their contribution for surgical difficulty and postoperative complica-tions in surgical removal of 100 impacted mandibular third molars. Three variables were found significant associated with total surgical time intervention, i.e., surgeon's experience (p=0.006), Inter-incisal opening (p=0.032), and cheek flexibility (p=0.004). Total surgical time intervention for 'right side' was higher with 49.20 ± 17.94 minutes (p=0.691). Total surgical time intervention for 'gagging reflex present' was 50.21 ± 17.812 (p=0.674). Multiple linear regression shows that surgeon's experience was the only predictor (p<0.001). The surgical difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar are likely to depend on the intraoperative factors like Surgeon's time, surgeon's experience, check flexibility, and inter incisal mouth opening.

Evaluation of demographic and radiological risk factors for assessment of difficulty in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a prospective study

The extraction of impacted third molars is among the most common surgical procedures carried out in the field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Both the patient and dentist must therefore have scientific evidence-based information concerning the estimated level of surgical difficulty of every case to consider in referring cases of impacted third molars for specialists' handling. We have undertaken a study in which demographic and radiological variables were considered to-gether to evaluate the risk factors for surgical difficulty in a cohort of 100 impacted mandibular third molars. There were 13 variables evaluated for surgical difficulty. Total surgical time interven-tion was noted at the end of each surgery. Each variable was analysed with total surgical time intervention with univariate and multiple linear regression. Out of 13 variables, 9 were found sta-tistically significant. The most significant predictors for surgical difficulty were Body Mass Index, Depth of impacted tooth and Retromolar space. No postoperative complications were reported.

The Institute of Urology, Peking University prostatectomy score: A simple preoperative classification of prostate cancer for predicting surgical difficulty and risk / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Traditional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a treatment choice in many developing countries and regions for most patients with localized prostate cancer; however, no system for predicting surgical difficulty and risk has been established. This study aimed to propose a simple and standard preoperative classification system of prostate cancer using preoperative data to predict surgical difficulty and risk and to evaluate the relationship between the data and postoperative complications. We collected data from 236 patients and divided them into three groups to evaluate and validate the relationships among preoperative, operative, and postoperative data. This new scoring system is based on the body mass index, ultrasonic prostate volume, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, middle lobe protrusion, and clinical stage. In the scoring group, we classified 89 patients into two groups: the low-risk group (score of <4) and high-risk group (score of ≥4), and then compared the postoperative data between the two groups. The positive surgical margin rate was higher in the high-risk group than low-risk group. The results in validation Groups A and B were similar to those in the scoring group. The focus of our scoring system is to allow for preliminary assessment of surgical difficulty by collecting the patients' basic information. Urologists can easily use the scoring system to evaluate the surgical difficulty and predict the risks of a positive surgical margin and urinary incontinence in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.